Are collections sets? (Q6874): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mesteranna (talk | contribs) Changed claim: published in string (P404): Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology |
Mesteranna (talk | contribs) Created claim: creator (P84): Karen M. Wickett (Q6875) |
||
| Property / creator | |||
| Property / creator: Karen M. Wickett / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Revision as of 14:10, 17 November 2025
The concept of a collection plays key roles in library, museum, and archival practice, and is arguably fundamental to information organization systems in general. Locating collection concepts in a reasonably robust ontology should have a number of practical advantages, including revealing inferencing opportunities and supporting consistency and coherence in system design and modeling. Although research practices involving collections have been studied empirically there has been surprisingly little attention given to the formal analysis of the concept itself, or to related notions like collection membership. With this paper we hope to convene that discussion, beginning with the question: Are collections sets?
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Are collections sets? |
The concept of a collection plays key roles in library, museum, and archival practice, and is arguably fundamental to information organization systems in general. Locating collection concepts in a reasonably robust ontology should have a number of practical advantages, including revealing inferencing opportunities and supporting consistency and coherence in system design and modeling. Although research practices involving collections have been studied empirically there has been surprisingly little attention given to the formal analysis of the concept itself, or to related notions like collection membership. With this paper we hope to convene that discussion, beginning with the question: Are collections sets? |